I love the spirit, but the words are ‘recondite’

Statue of Winston ChurchillWayne State University is again trying to draw attention to some of the English language’s “most expressive — yet regrettably neglected — words.” Its annual list shares words it says “deserve to be used more often in conversation and prose.”

I love the spirit of the idea, as I said in 2016. But some of the complicated and unusual words that make the list are more likely to cause confusion than “expand our ability to communicate clearly,” which is WSU’s Jerry Herron’s hope.

Eucatastrophe, for instance, calls to mind catastrophe. But the former means “a sudden and favorable resolution of events in a story; a happy ending.” Not quite the “great and sudden disaster” you think of when you hear catastrophe.

Other words from the latest list are more likely to make the reader say, “Whaaaat?” than to clearly communicate:

  • insuperable (impossible to overcome)
  • frangible (fragile; brittle)
  • recondite (little known; abstruse)
  • littoral (relating to or situated on the shore of a sea or lake)

I feel a little warmer about bilious (spiteful; bad-tempered); couth (cultured, refined and well-mannered); and compunction (a feeling of guilt or moral scruple that prevents or follows the doing of something bad).

In other years, I’ve had more to cheer about, maybe because I have used all these words, if only in jest:

  • absquatulate (to discreetly leave a gathering or party without informing the host, a word apparently used by Winston Churchill)
  • bamboozle (to cheat or steal)
  • bereft (deprived; lacking something needed, wanted or expected)
  • boondoggle (work or activity that is wasteful or pointless but gives the appearance of having value)
  • cahoots (partnership, collusion or collaboration, often with nefarious implications)
  • panache (distinctive, often flamboyant, style or action)
  • rumpus (a noisy, confused or disruptive commotion; well-known in our house from Maurice Sendak’s Where the Wild Things Are).

The site says the words it lists “deserve retrieval from the linguistic closet.” (Isn’t that a great line?) After all, “Everybody knows words whose revival would make the speaking and writing of English a livelier, snappier pastime and more satisfying for us all.”

Yeah, eucatastrophe doesn’t quite fit that bill, does it?

Have your say in the next list by submitting words you think DO make English snappier. See the full list, where you’ll find my own submission: convivial (friendly, sociable and lively), with the example, “One does not leave a convivial party before closing time,” attributed to Winston Churchill.

Image of a statue of Winston Churchill by “skeeze” and Pixabay.

This entry was posted in The Red Jacket Diaries blog and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Posted May 2, 2018 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    I have to confess I have come across some of these words while reading, and had to look them up. Frangible and littoral come to mind.

    I agree that using a word that’s almost guaranteed to confuse readers is never a good idea — like eucatastrophe.

  2. Posted May 2, 2018 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Earlier lists seemed to have more useful words that didn’t require a dictionary at hand. Maybe people are just trying for unusual now!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Subscribe

    Subscribe via RSS